- Joined
- Oct 19, 2020
- Posts
- 3,005
- Reaction
- 1,292
- Points
- 1,012
This piece is created as a response to Origins: The Doctrine of The Creation (Genesis 1:1)
Fair warning: if you have opposing belief, you are welcome to read and comment in your criticsm to this post. BUT I do not recommend reading this if your faith is a source of your happiness. This piece might trigger you.
Genesis, despite the advancements in archeology, has remained mystery, regarding its true source as to who wrote it, when it was written and where was the writer from. This is why there are still people who believe it literally, the fundamental Christians, and would rather form accuse conspiracies to modern scientific discoveries.
Russell Gmirkin argues that the reason we have not found any good evidence is because we assumed that the Bible is of an Eastern background. Gmirkin proposes we look at the Greek text and literature and we would find more evidence here.
Gmirkin argues that Genesis, along with Pentateuch was actually written and was highly inspired by Plato's work. It's narratives does not belong to the creation myths in the ancient near east. It is physics and sciences, wrapped in the a veil of myth. These ideas used by the narrative was actually based on the "scientific" theories - or cosmogenies - proposed by Plato in his work Timeaus, and other philosophers in his time. Although Plato himself disagrees on some of the theories, It proves that the writer(s) of Genesis is actually well-versed in the cosmogenies of the era, and may even be Platonists in belief, putting Genesis no earlier than the 3rd century BC.
Let us look at the conceptually inspired creation accounts in Genesis, and what ideas they were based on.
God said, “Let there be…” — Xenophanes: a supreme being set all things into motion by thoughts of his mind alone.
God saw the light was good — Plato: God was good and creating the cosmos in his perfect image
God separated the light from the darkness — Empêdocles; Hesiod and Plato – cosmos was formed by separating its primary elements
Light appears before the sun is formed — Empèdocles’ theory of aether; Zeno; also Hesiod and Plato
God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night” — Plato: the importance of names
Evening and morning were the first day — Plato: God’s first act of creation was time (days and nights and other means for measuring time)
...to be continued..
[Part 1]
Part 2
Part 3
Fair warning: if you have opposing belief, you are welcome to read and comment in your criticsm to this post. BUT I do not recommend reading this if your faith is a source of your happiness. This piece might trigger you.
GENESIS IS PLATO REPACKAGED
Genesis, despite the advancements in archeology, has remained mystery, regarding its true source as to who wrote it, when it was written and where was the writer from. This is why there are still people who believe it literally, the fundamental Christians, and would rather form accuse conspiracies to modern scientific discoveries.
Russell Gmirkin argues that the reason we have not found any good evidence is because we assumed that the Bible is of an Eastern background. Gmirkin proposes we look at the Greek text and literature and we would find more evidence here.
PLATO
Plato is one of the most well-known philosopher. Philosophy in his time is a body of knowledge which is an amalgam of science, math, theology, politics and literature.Gmirkin argues that Genesis, along with Pentateuch was actually written and was highly inspired by Plato's work. It's narratives does not belong to the creation myths in the ancient near east. It is physics and sciences, wrapped in the a veil of myth. These ideas used by the narrative was actually based on the "scientific" theories - or cosmogenies - proposed by Plato in his work Timeaus, and other philosophers in his time. Although Plato himself disagrees on some of the theories, It proves that the writer(s) of Genesis is actually well-versed in the cosmogenies of the era, and may even be Platonists in belief, putting Genesis no earlier than the 3rd century BC.
Let us look at the conceptually inspired creation accounts in Genesis, and what ideas they were based on.
FIRST DAY
God said, “Let there be…” — Xenophanes: a supreme being set all things into motion by thoughts of his mind alone.
The best parallel is perhaps provided by the natural philosopher Xenophanes, who held that the omnipotent supreme being effortlessly set all things into motion by the thoughts of his mind alone (Simplicius, Physics 23.11, 20; Sextus Empiricus, Against the Mathematicians 9.144; cf. Jaeger 1936: 45; Flannery 2010: 84)
God saw the light was good — Plato: God was good and creating the cosmos in his perfect image
He was good, and in him that is good no envy ariseth ever concerning anything; and being devoid of envy He desired that all should be, so far as possible, like unto Himself. (29e)
He fashioned the All, that so the work He was executing might be of its nature most fair and most good. (30b)
God separated the light from the darkness — Empêdocles; Hesiod and Plato – cosmos was formed by separating its primary elements
From Chaos were born Erebos [Darkness] and black Nyx [Night];
from Nyx were born Aither and Hemera [Day]
Light appears before the sun is formed — Empèdocles’ theory of aether; Zeno; also Hesiod and Plato
The four elements together constitute unqualified substance or matter. Fire is the hot element, water the moist, air the cold, earth the dry. . . . Fire has the uppermost place ; it is also called aether, and in it the sphere of the fixed stars is first created ; then comes the sphere of the planets, next to that the air, then the water, and lowest of all the earth, which is at the centre of all things. (Diogenes Laertius, explaining the theory of Empêdocles.)
God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night” — Plato: the importance of names
Evening and morning were the first day — Plato: God’s first act of creation was time (days and nights and other means for measuring time)
For simultaneously with the construction of the Heaven He contrived the production of days and nights and months and years, which existed not before the Heaven came into being. And these are all portions of Time; even as “Was” and “Shall be” are generated forms of Time (Timaeus 37e)
...to be continued..
[Part 1]
Part 2
Part 3
Attachments
-
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Last edited: