Cerebellum
Eternal Poster
Depende sa reader .. if he thinks that way, like what you did in the verse of Ephesians 4:30 Twisting sentences and phrases. .It implied yun...
Depende sa reader .. if he thinks that way, like what you did in the verse of Ephesians 4:30 Twisting sentences and phrases. .It implied yun...
So this how you connect other topics to support your faulty doctrines?Depende sa reader .. if he thinks that way, like what you did in the verse of Ephesians 4:30
Duh? Bakit? Ganoon mo nga ba kadaling intindihin ang isang pangungusap at ituring na yun nga ang totoo kasi yun ang naiisip mong totoo?So this how you connect other topics to support your faulty doctrines?
Kaya nga is a form. Both deny Jesus as part of the Godhead. Both put Jesus as below the Father, may nuisance kay but in it's core the same kaya nga form.Because they do not believe in the Trinity dogma, it has been said of Jehovah’s Witnesses that they practice “a form of Arianism.”You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. But the fact that they are not Trinitarians does not make them Arians. In one of the few writings of Arius that has survived, he claims that God is beyond comprehension, even for the Son. In line with this, historian H. M. Gwatkin states in his book The Arian Controversy: “The God of Arius is an unknown God, whose being is hidden in eternal mystery. No creature can reveal him, and he cannot reveal himself.” Jehovah’s Witnesses worship neither the “incomprehensible” God of the Trinitarians nor the “unknown God” of Arius. They say, with the apostle Paul: “There is actually to us one God the Father, out of whom all things are.”—You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..
I would apply to context for the Bible of course. Not the way around. But can be sarcastic to someDuh? Bakit? Ganoon mo nga ba kadaling intindihin ang isang pangungusap at ituring na yun nga ang totoo kasi yun ang naiisip mong totoo?
Nasan na yung context matters na sinasabi mo?
Context for the Bible? Nah.I would apply to context for the Bible of course. Not the way around. But can be sarcastic to some
See you around too..Context for the Bible? Nah.
not the way around your face
see ya around
Wait mo gawan ko thread yan hehehenaku mukhang meron ng supporting verse ang trinity ah
eto yung translation ko sa titus 2:13
original text:
προσδεχόμενοι τὴν μακαρίαν ἐλπίδα καὶ ἐπιφάνειαν τῆς δόξης τοῦ μεγάλου θεοῦ καὶ σωτῆρος ἡμῶν ἰησοῦ χριστοῦ,
word by word translation:
προσδεχόμενοι - awaiting
τὴν - the (accusative)
μακαρίαν - blessed
ἐλπίδα - hope
καὶ - and
ἐπιφάνειαν - manifestation
τῆς - the (genitive)
δόξης - glory
τοῦ - the (genitive)
μεγάλου - great
θεοῦ - god
καὶ - and
σωτῆρος - savior
ἡμῶν - ours (genitive)
ἰησοῦ - jesus
χριστοῦ - christ
following accusative/genitive cases i get:
awaiting the blessed hope and manifestation of glory of the great god and savior of ours jesus christ
papasok ang trinity dito if we mean jesus christ as the great god and savior of ours
meron pa din naman possibility na hindi if we mean both the great god and jesus ang mag manifest
aguy may +1 point na si trinity