Sino ba iboboto niyo
- Thread starter _TriXsha_
- Start date
need ko lang talga deep research, BBM hindi dapat ako naka focus sa past probs nila don ako sa mga nagawa nila kasi para sakin dapat nag focus sila sa future natin hindi sa current situation ngayon both Leni and BBM are good at there plans for people. basta keep friendly lang po tayo hindi naman tayo maging rich agad pag iboboto natin sino sa kanila.... happier than past be happier for tomorrow
Ikw nagsabi nyan I refer my self to be selective I mean ung sinasabi ikw din ganun
Mahina nga kasi ebidensya nila mga mukhang pera ka si mga dilawan inggit sa yaman ng marcos yun lng un..
Dun nlng ako sa magnanakaw daw kesa naman kay len len na puro lng salita kaya lng tatakbo kasi nautusan lng bka pagnanalo yan si len len malagay din sa pera yung asawa o kaya magpatayo ng rebulto..hahaha
Kaya lng nmn ngpapakita kasi tatakbo..hahaha dilaw yan si len len bkt ng pink..hahaha may pinagtatakpan..hahahaDun ka sa may napatunayan na habang na sa pwesto wag Yung mag papakita lang kapag election.At wag ma papadala sa mga fake news laging mag fact check.
LetLeniLead
Last edited:
Ahhh ganun ba? tagal na pala nya nangangampnyan kac nuon pa mang d pa sya politician tumutulong na sya sa mga mahihirap
Di talaga nakakaintindi.
May warrant of arrest nga. Nakapiyansa lang kaya malaya.
Anong ebidensya pa kailangan?
avvillarin
Leecher
ISKO
wag mo na ipilit ung piyansa.. eexplain ko ba ulet sau bkit nakakag piyansa ung akusado? haha
Gandang source niyan: Blessed shit
— "𝗞𝗨𝗡𝗚 𝗧𝗔𝗟𝗔𝗚𝗔𝗡𝗚 𝗡𝗔𝗚𝗡𝗔𝗞𝗔𝗪 𝗔𝗡𝗚 𝗠𝗚𝗔 𝗠𝗔𝗥𝗖𝗢𝗦𝗘𝗦, 𝗕𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗧 𝗪𝗔𝗟𝗔𝗡𝗚 𝗡𝗔𝗞𝗨𝗟𝗢𝗡𝗚?"
1. There was no ANTI-PLUNDER LAW during the Marcos' case. (NO RETROACTIVE EFFECT - Hindi maaring hatulan ang mga Marcoses gamit ang 1991 ANTI-PLUNDER LAW)
2. In the 1955 Anti-Ill Gotten Wealth Act (Republic Act 1379) which was the basis of the Marcos case, there was no imprisonment penalty for public officials. The only penalty for such offense is forfeiting all ill-gotten assets which happened to the Marcos' case.(You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.)
3. The Marcoses have ill-gotten wealth. That is the legal truth. The Court has already ruled in several cases on this matter and such decisions are already final. You can disagree with it and are free to have your own opinion, but we need to respect the rulings of the Court.
4. The Swiss Foundation deposits ($658M) was considered ill-gotten wealth by the Supreme Court because the Marcoses failed to justify the lawful acquisition of these assets. (Korte Suprema: G.R. No. 152154 Republic vs. Sandiganbayan)
5. Nahatulan si Imelda Marcos ng Sandiganbayan noong 2018 na GUILTY OF 7 COUNTS OF GRAFT na may parusang 6 years each, or total of 42 years. Agad-agad siyang nagpiyansa kaya hindi na naituloy ang pagkakakulong sa kaniya. Mananatili siyang malaya hangga't hindi pa naaaksyunan ng Korte Suprema ang kaniyang appeal. Ito ay kalayaang mula sa mga karapatan niya sa ilalim ng demokrasya na pinasinayaan ni Pangulong Corazon Aquino. (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.)
Sa ngayon, Forfeiture Case at awaiting finality (Imelda's) na lamang ang pinaglalabanan ng mga Marcoses at ng Gobyerno.
Tandaan: Hindi porket hindi nakulong, inosente na. Alamin. Aralin. Mag-isip! (203B)
Last edited:
ill gotten wealth tapos dudugsungan ng o ninakaw na yaman haha.
kaya nga nakalaya kc d pa tapos ung kaso ganun lang ka simple yun.. misleading ung d pa naaksyunan ano tulog ung korte??? hahaha..
wag isisi kay bbm ung states tax ung bir at pcgg ang katukin nio haha
BIR OFFICIALS: MARCOS HEIRS CAN’T BE COMPELLED TO PAY P203B TAX DEFICIENCY”
(Manila Bulletin 04-03-2022)
— BIR’s field officials, who requested anonymity, explained that the estate tax is levied on real and personal properties of a dead person and not on the assets owned by his relatives.
— “I can’t recall of any individual being sent to jail for non-payment of the said tax,” one of the regional directors said.
— He said the proper thing to do under the Tax Code and revenue regulations is to seize and sell in public auction the properties of the deceased to settle the indebtedness.
— “That is what we have been doing for years since the death of the former strong man, but the problem nobody was interested in buying them,”
Last edited:
Convicted. May desisyon na ang korte. Ito ilan o:ill gotten wealth tapos dudugsungan ng o ninakaw na yaman haha.
kaya nga nakalaya kc d pa tapos ung kaso ganun lang ka simple yun.. misleading ung d pa naaksyunan ano tulog ung korte??? hahaha..
wag isisi kay bbm ung states tax ung bir at pcgg ang katukin nio haha
BIR OFFICIALS: MARCOS HEIRS CAN’T BE COMPELLED TO PAY P203B TAX DEFICIENCY”
(Manila Bulletin 04-03-2022)
— BIR’s field officials, who requested anonymity, explained that the estate tax is levied on real and personal properties of a dead person and not on the assets owned by his relatives.
— “I can’t recall of any individual being sent to jail for non-payment of the said tax,” one of the regional directors said.
— He said the proper thing to do under the Tax Code and revenue regulations is to seize and sell in public auction the properties of the deceased to settle the indebtedness.
— “That is what we have been doing for years since the death of the former strong man, but the problem nobody was interested in buying them,”
Sandiganbayan:
| Further action/Notes | |
|---|---|
| Court | Sandiganbayan |
| Case Type | Criminal |
| Case No. | 17287 |
| Date Filed | December 18, 1991 |
| Offense/Petition | Vio. of RA 3019, 3(h) |
| Disposal | Convicted |
| Date Disposed | 11/09/18 |
| Respondent | Marcos, Imelda |
| Further action/Notes | |
| Court | Sandiganbayan |
| Case Type | Criminal |
| Case No. | 17288 |
| Date Filed | December 18, 1991 |
| Offense/Petition | Vio. of RA 3019, 3(h) |
| Disposal | Convicted |
| Date Disposed | 11/09/18 |
| Respondent | Marcos, Imelda |
| Further action/Notes | |
|---|---|
| Court | Sandiganbayan |
| Case Type | Criminal |
| Case No. | 17289 |
| Date Filed | December 18, 1991 |
| Offense/Petition | Vio. of RA 3019, 3(h) |
| Disposal | Convicted |
| Date Disposed | 11/09/18 |
| Respondent | Marcos, Imelda |
| Further action/Notes | |
| Court | Sandiganbayan |
| Case Type | Criminal |
| Case No. | 17290 |
| Date Filed | December 18, 1991 |
| Offense/Petition | Vio. of RA 3019, 3(h) |
| Disposal | Convicted |
| Date Disposed | 11/09/18 |
| Respondent | Marcos, Imelda |
| Further action/Notes | |
| Court | Sandiganbayan |
| Case Type | Criminal |
| Case No. | 22867 |
| Date Filed | May 9, 1995 |
| Offense/Petition | Vio. of RA 3019, 3(h) |
| Disposal | Convicted |
| Date Disposed | 11/09/18 |
| Respondent | Marcos, Imelda |
| Further action/Notes | |
| Court | Sandiganbayan |
| Case Type | Criminal |
| Case No. | 22868 |
| Date Filed | May 9, 1995 |
| Offense/Petition | Vio. of RA 3019, 3(h) |
| Disposal | Convicted |
| Date Disposed | 11/09/18 |
| Respondent | Marcos, Imelda |
| Further action/Notes | |
| Court | Sandiganbayan |
| Case Type | Criminal |
| Case No. | 22869 |
| Date Filed | May 9, 1995 |
| Offense/Petition | Vio. of RA 3019, 3(h) |
| Disposal | Convicted |
| Date Disposed | 11/09/18 |
| Respondent | Marcos, Imelda |
| Court | Sandiganbayan |
|---|---|
| Case Type | Civil |
| Case No. | 0141 |
| Date Filed | December 17, 1991 |
| Offense/Petition | Petition for Forfeiture |
| Disposal | Pending |
| Date Disposed | |
| Respondent | Marcos, Imelda and family |
| Further action/Notes | (see summary judgments) |
| Court | Sandiganbayan |
| Case Type | Civil - Summary Judgment |
| Case No. | 0141 |
| Date Filed | March 10, 2000 |
| Offense/Petition | Petition for Forfeiture (Swiss funds) |
| Disposal | Granted |
| Date Disposed | 09/19/00 |
| Respondent | Marcos, Imelda and family |
| Further action/Notes | Reversed by Sandiganbayan on 01/31/02. Reversal set aside by SC in GR No. 152154 on 07/15/03. |
| Court | Sandiganbayan |
| Case Type | Civil - Partial Summary Judgment |
| Case No. | 0141 |
| Date Filed | July 16, 2004 |
| Offense/Petition | Petition for Forfeiture (Arelma assets) |
| Disposal | Granted |
| Date Disposed | 04/02/09 |
| Respondent | Marcos, Imelda and family |
| Further action/Notes | Affirmed by SC in GR No. 189434 on 04/25/12 |
| Court | Sandiganbayan |
| Case Type | Civil - Partial Summary Judgment |
| Case No. | 0141 |
| Date Filed | June 24, 2009 |
| Offense/Petition | Petition for Forfeiture (Malacañang Jewelry Collection) |
| Disposal | Granted |
| Date Disposed | 01/13/14 |
| Respondent | Marcos, Imelda and family |
| Further action/Notes | Affirmed by SC in GR No. 213027 on 01/18/07 |
| Further action/Notes | |
|---|---|
| Court | US - New York and New Jersey courts |
| Case Type | Civil |
| Case No. | - |
| Date Filed | - |
| Offense/Petition | Forfeiture of properties in New York and New Jersey |
| Disposal | Granted |
| Date Disposed | 1986 |
| Respondent | Marcos family |
May mga pending pa. Pero ayan meron ding tapos na. Kaya may nabawi, dahil may ninakaw.
Last edited:
d pa tapos yan idadaan pa yan sa supreme court dun mag kakaron ng final judgement. wag misleading... tulad ng DQ nio kay BBM d pa tapos un idadaan pa un sa supreme court malay nio maiba ung hatol hahaha!
gamitan mo kc ng common sense bakit nakakapag piyansa kc ongoing pa ung case hindi dahil madaming pera. pag yan ay may final judgement na d na yan makakapag piyansa period.
i- search mo kaya yung case number.
convicted na nga. final na. guilty.
wala pa yung estate tax diyan partida. ayun final and executory na.
ikaw ang misleading. mas marunong ka pa sa korte.
ha sandigan bayan yan d yan supreme court... wala pang final judgement... ipakita mo link ng supreme court. back read ka dun sa 203 billion haha.
kelan pa nagkaron ng final judgement ang sandigang bayan?? haha! so tanggaling na natin ang supreme court?? haha nway basahin mo ung pinost ko dun sa propaganda mong 203B..ifact check mo kung ayaw mo maniwala
real talk lang kaya tau nag tatalo talo ngaun. kasalanan to ng santo nyong si Cory. gusto umuwi ng pinas ni Marcos upang sagutin lahat ng accusation sa kanya at para makita ung nanay nyang kakamatay pa lamang. ano ginawa ni Cory ayaw payagan si Marcos umuwi para sagutin lahat.
nag pakalat ng libro sa mga school na mag nanakaw diktador..
puro self serving yung nangyari..
pinag bibigay sa mga kasapi ung mga property ng gobyerno, pinalaya yung leader ng ccp npa.. kinancel lahat ng project ni marcos. nag patayo ng rebulto..
Last edited:
Baka Joshua to
Honorary Poster
Baka limit to
Sa gobyerno ba pera ginamit dito
?Paki fackcheck narin kung totooBaka limit to
Sa gobyerno ba pera ginamit dito
follow your heart , char!
Long live DIGITAL WARRIORS dito, na kakajoin lang, hahahahah!
Last edited:
Similar threads
-
-
-
-
Tanong..sino po ba si Jonathan Morales trending ngayon
- Started by Wu_Fei
- Replies: 3
-
Sino gusto niyo ma meet in person dito sa PHC?
- Started by ShadowsucksR
- Replies: 53
Popular Tags
alice
ang
ano
aquino
ayuda
barangay
bbm
bong bong marcos
check
china
chinese
comelec
confidential funds
dito
drugs
duterte
election
election 2022
election2022
fund
gags & jokes
halalan 2022
hindi
interview
lang
law
leni
leni kiko
leni robredo
marcos
martial law
memes
mga
opinion
para
philippine
philippines
pilipinas
politcs
political
politics
president
robin padilla
sara duterte
senate
survey
unity
war
weak
you