Ito yung original video nyan
Attachments
-
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
FAKE! They didn't name it "trans" para lang i-associate sa transgender issue. Drop an article that will support what you stated.the other "trans" mentioned were already been existing long time ago and they just re-named those mental conditions with a "trans" prefix to orchestrate an issue against "transgenders"
ahaha di mo alam wikipedia boss?FAKE! They didn't name it "trans" para lang i-associate sa transgender issue. Drop an article that will support what you stated.
You rely and believe in wikipedia? That's funnyahaha di mo alam wikipedia boss?
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
need mo pa ba ng source for when did the term "transgender" started?
kasi obviously it is a 20th century term, latest technology iyan
re-naming mental disorders with prefix "trans" is not even correct because "thinking you're a girl even if you're a boy" does not fu̾cking make you a "transgender"
transgender is a term used for people who used technology to actually modify their bodies that you think is created by your god haha sadly it's now modified iyak na lang yung god who created our bodies
wikipedia can be edited by anyone, i just wonder why haven't you edited that wikipedia article to match your views hahaYou rely and believe in wikipedia? That's funny
the article is using the correct meaning of trans which is a body that is modifiedAllow me to give you an online article. Something you may need to read for you to understand that they name it "trans-x" not because of what you stated na "to orchestrate an issue against transgenders".
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Alam mo naman palang it can be edited. Even at school, wikipedia is not considered a reliable source. Bakit hindi mo i-edit at baka sakaling maging reliable? LOLwikipedia can be edited by anyone, i just wonder why haven't you edited that wikipedia article to match your views haha
The article states "They feel they are disabled people trapped in abled bodies. Some people feel that they are meant to be amputees and will even injure themselves in order to create the desired amputation or make it medically necessary for a surgeon to perform it. Other people feel that they were meant to be blind or deaf." This is in line with the video I posted. I don't know why hindi mo naintidihan both the video and the article..the article is using the correct meaning of trans which is a body that is modified
this article is not related to the topic in which "transabled" is given a different meaning of "a healthy person who thinks he is disabled"
Who said that? Did I say that "A man who thinks he is a woman is a transgender"? I didn't say anything like that. Did you say it before sa thread na ito kaya sinabi mong "uulitin" mo? I don't think so.again uulitin ko sa iyo ito:
just because you think you're a girl even if you're a boy does not fu̾cking make you a transgender
actually that's the reason why it's the most reliable source for me because whatever is the most accepted will always be postedAlam mo naman palang it can be edited. Even at school, wikipedia is not considered a reliable source. Bakit hindi mo i-edit at baka sakaling maging reliable? LOL
i see it na yung conventional naman pala na meaning is a mental illness for transgender, yes you got me corrected on the meaning, but i still argue that the "transable" is nauna pa sa "transgender"The article states "They feel they are disabled people trapped in abled bodies. Some people feel that they are meant to be amputees and will even injure themselves in order to create the desired amputation or make it medically necessary for a surgeon to perform it. Other people feel that they were meant to be blind or deaf." This is in line with the video I posted. I don't know why hindi mo naintidihan both the video and the article..
I provided a valid article for you to understand that they name it "trans-x" not just to "orchestrate an issue against transgenders"
Who said that? Did I say that "A man who thinks he is a woman is a transgender"? I didn't say anything like that. Did you say it before sa thread na ito kaya sinabi mong "uulitin" mo? I don't think so.
This article You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. defines what transgender mean. It says "A transgender person is someone who has a different gender identity to their assigned s3x at birth."
With your statement, you are implying na hindi mo naiintindihan ang lahat. Pati nga wikipedia mo same lang din ang meaning ng transgender. Bakid hindi mo i-edit in that way it will match your views?
Well, it's up to you if you think that wikipedia is the most reliable source. Just like what I mentioned, even sa school, they don't see it that way. Try to pass a research paper na ang reference mo ay wikipedia, automatic yan na hindi maa-acknowledge.actually that's the reason why it's the most reliable source for me because whatever is the most accepted will always be posted
Then show me a valid article that will support your statement na ang "transable" is just a hoax.i see it na yung conventional naman pala na meaning is a mental illness for transgender, yes you got me corrected on the meaning, but i still argue that the "transable" is nauna pa sa "transgender"
yung mental problem about genders is later than that of body integrity mental problem so against pa din ako sa video that is orchestrating "transgender" as the source of all trans mental problems
yes because wikipedia is only a database, it does not generate its own content, wikipedia is just gathering data into 1 database, the actual source is linked at the bottom of each wikipedia articleWell, it's up to you if you think that wikipedia is the most reliable source. Just like what I mentioned, even sa school, they don't see it that way. Try to pass a research paper na ang reference mo ay wikipedia, automatic yan na hindi maa-acknowledge.
it's not hoax but it just didn't come from transgender as what the video is orchestrating that transgender is the source of all trans mental problemsThen show me a valid article that will support your statement na ang "transable" is just a hoax.
No, it's not. It's a user-generated source. If you believe that wikipedia is a reliable source, then read this from wikipedia itself...yes because wikipedia is only a database, it does not generate its own content, wikipedia is just gathering data into 1 database, the actual source is linked at the bottom of each wikipedia article
Provide a valid articleit's not hoax but it just didn't come from transgender as what the video is orchestrating that transgender is the source of all trans mental problems
users are the one building the database, they don't own the information, they only own the article, and they still need to link the original source or else their article can get edited by another user, the picture you posted refers to the wikipedia articles which is not originally generated by wikipedia, wikipedia owns nothing so di talaga siya pwedeng maging sourceNo, it's not. It's a user-generated source. If you believe that wikipedia is a reliable source, then read this from wikipedia itself...
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.Provide a valid article
So you now agree that it's not reliable? That wikipedia article you provided didn't say that "transable" is not a thing until "transgender". Again, provide a valid reference.users are the one building the database, they don't own the information, they only own the article, and they still need to link the original source or else their article can get edited by another user, the picture you posted refers to the wikipedia articles which is not originally generate by wikipedia, wikipedia owns nothing so di talaga siya pwedeng maging source
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
history of discovery is independent to being transgender
it is reliabe source due to being readily editable but it is not the original source since it owns nothingSo you now agree that it's not reliable?
it is already a thing because it did not come nga from being transgender, it is a separate disorder ngaThat wikipedia article you provided didn't say that "transable" is not a thing until "transgender". Again, provide a valid reference.
You said "wikipedia owns nothing so di talaga siya pwedeng maging source" yet you still say na it is reliable?it is reliabe source due to being readily editable but it is not the original source since it owns nothing
it is already a thing because it did not come nga from being transgender, it is a separate disorder nga
magiging invalid siya sa research kasi hindi siya ang original even if it's reliable, but for personal use i will just click on the original source linked at the bottom of each article so i am still able to use the original source in a research through the help of wikipediaYou said "wikipedia owns nothing so di talaga siya pwedeng maging source" yet you still say na it is reliable?
Hahahahaha. Ang sabi ng pag-aaral, makaki raw ang kinalaman ng mga kinakain natin about diyan. Hahahaha
Now transwomen and invading ung mga historical women spaces like bathrooms and sports dahil sa “identity” nila..