toink kaya nga tool lang siya it means meron gagamit sa kanya to serve its mind controlling purpose, kaya nga diba sinasabi palagi ng religion na wag aralin on your own kasi the reader might not get controlled without someone who knows how to use the tool and this is due to the readers freedom to give any meaning to it
simply because it makes a person follow/controlled (expected outcome for a mind control process)pano sya paps naging mind controlling tools?
di ko masyado gets ang analogy mo, explain mo na lang ang relationship ng analogy mo dun sa sinabi ko bossAnalogy tayo.
Diba ang bangus pwede gawin sinigang.
Ang sinigang maasim yan diba? Kungware hindi ko type ng maasim.. fair ba sabihin na ayaw ko ng bangus kasi maasim ang bangus? Na dahil may mga tao na pwedeng magsigang ng bangus, maasim LANG ang bangus.
Ganyan logic ng sinabi mo.
Ibig sabihin depende sa analytical skills ng nagbabasa. Kung hnd mo kaya basahin ang bible maliban sa "mind controlling" na sinasabi mo, hnd bible may problema, kundi ung analytical skills mo sa pagbasa nito.simply because it makes a person follow/controlled (expected outcome for a mind control)
di ko masyado gets ang analogy mo, explain mo na lang ang relationship ng analogy mo dun sa sinabi ko boss
yung influences ba came from science discoveries, eh hindi ba yon nakakaapekto sa isip at behaviour ng tao?simply because it makes a person follow/controlled (expected outcome for a mind control process)
Good point.yung influences ba came from science discoveries, eh hindi ba yon nakakaapekto sa isip at behaviour ng tao?
yes and it is compulsory for survival kaya nga meron sciences sa compulsory basic education dibayung influences ba came from science discoveries, eh hindi ba yon nakakaapekto sa isip at behaviour ng tao?
not an effect of science since science does not teach na gumawa ng bomb, bible however taught about wag gumawa ng masama so it's more of the bible's failure to control the mind than science teaching about itAnd yung mga scientists na nakagawa ng atomic bombs na ginamit noong WWII, yung discoveries nila about sa mga element na ginamit sa paggawa no'n, hindi din ba yo'n effects ng science?
not an effect of science since science does not teach na gumawa ng bomb
actually everyone can make something bad out of any knowledge, all you have to have is the will to do it, so hindi pa din intention ng science iyon but intention ng tao, just because you know how to cook îllégâl drugs doesn't mean mean you will do the cooking, you need some motivation and it is not scienceHindi ko sinabi paps na yung "science eh nagteach syang gumawa ng bomb" but rather, I asked, what about yung learnings na natutunan nila sa science na puwede pala i-combine yung iba't-ibang elements to make that kind of bombs? hindi ba nakaimpluwensiya sa pag-iisip nung mga "scientist" yung learnings na yon para gawin yung atomic bomb?
So there's nothing wrong if the Bible contains writings na wag gumawa ng masama, kasi nasa tao naman yon kung susunod siya sa nakasulat doon or hindi ..actually everyone can make something bad out of any knowledge, all you have to have is the will to do it, so hindi pa din intention ng science iyon but intention ng tao, just because you know how to cook îllégâl drugs doesn't mean mean you will do the cooking, you need some motivation and it is not science
this is not about whether mind control is good or bad, this is just about confirming the mind control, ibang topic iyon ang good or bad, conventionally mind control is bad kaya siguro napaka advance mo to defend right away hehe don't wory i don't always follow what is conventionalSo there's nothing wrong if the Bible contains writings na wag gumawa ng masama, kasi nasa tao naman yon kung susunod siya sa nakasulat doon or hindi ..
and nasa tao at religion yon kung gagamitin nila ang Bible para maniobrahin ang pag-iisip ng ibang tao .. walang kasalanan ang Bibliya pagdating sa bagay na yan tulad din ng science na wala din intention to influence others para gumawa ng mga bagay na nakakapinsala sa iba..
Okay ..this is not about whether mind control is good or bad, this is just about confirming the mind control, ibang topic iyon ang good or bad, conventionally mind control is bad
Sakto lng paps .. Gusto ko lng malaman stand mo din about sa science kung paano yon nakaapekto sa advancements ng mga powerful weapon na ginagamit para pumatay ng mga tao ..kaya siguro napaka advance mo to defend right away hehe don't wory i don't always follow what is conventional
pag sumunod ba boss ala nang chance na mapahamak?not tool for controlling, but a tool for advising. apaka deep kasi ng word na "Control" tho mandatory na sumunod ka kahit ayaw mo and else if hindi ka sumunod there's a chance na mapahamak ka.
sample analogy here is batas ng bansa. si juan di sumunod sa batas trapiko, ayon naticketan. (haha korny ko pero sana naintindihan nyo) kung baga there's standard protocol na dapat sundin.
Di ganon ang Bible.
I'm referring sa offense na possible makuha ng di sumunod. literal na pahamak ang sinasabi mo. here's another example. North Korea Government, look Government control yong people(d ko na to i elaborate, common na to). wether you like it or not dapat sumunod ka. eto pa. Robot na may Remote control, haha. diba kung baga sa security may standard protocol na sya or sa programming mga defined variable haha.pag sumunod ba boss ala nang chance na mapahamak?
so nag decide ako na i-consider ang things in the bible as bu̾llshit, at yun ang action taken ko, am i still considered as a christian making decisions and taking actions? or the bible just failed to control medi ganon ang bible. tho it's not just a book. bible gives Scripture and other stuff na ikaw parin ang magdedesisyon kung anong form of action ang itatake mo in the future. di yon Mind Control or what, alam mo tawag dun?
