BIBLE, A TOOL TO CONTROL?

[Cerebellum]

or the bible just failed to control me

tingin ko eto sagot

bible gives Scripture and other stuff na ikaw parin ang magdedesisyon kung anong form of action ang itatake mo in the future.

sa isang magulang na ginawa ang lahat para mapasunod ang anak sa landas na gusto nila para sa kaniya, pero hindi pa rin iyon ang ginawa ng anak nila, eh tingin mo paps, nagfail yung magulang sa anak nila or sadyang yung anak ang nagdesisyon para sa buhay niya?

 

[plhbg1]

tingin ko eto sagot

yeah the bible should control or limit what should a person act, there should be rules to follow

 

[Bilimanok]

generally speaking in general lang any religion Christianity at iba pa or ancient religions, animism, shamanism, spirits

YES tool of control sya why kung hindi sya tool of control wala ng civilization ngayon hindi yan mag-prosper ang civilization ng tao kase gagawin ng tao gusto nyang gawin papatay yan, mang-aagaw ng asawa, magiging psychopath dahil wala syang kinakatakutan na eternal damnation or karma or nirvana to control ya primal instinct natin

sa current time may control pa ba obvious naman na nabawasan na yun control you can be what you want to be feeling mo ibon ka or aso ka pwede ngayon

LGBT pwedeng pwede sa christianity at sa japan

iba transable gusto nilang maging disable kahit healthy sila

gusto mong maging atheist or theist libre ngayon walang nagbabawal at wala ng excommunication or inquisition ngayon

pero syempre may mga LAWS pa din tayo not to harm other people

 

[kentzlip21]

Ang nasa puso ko lang huh.the kingdom of God is in me or us.hindi hinyaan ng Dios ang tao maka alam ng tunay na mangyayari sa loob ng bibliya..ang itinuro niya at pinaka importante sa lahat ay umibig ng kapwa ng higit sa kanyang sarili..

 

[Drek_Clumsy]

Ito po meaning ng B.I.B.L.E......,

B -Basic
I - Instruction
B - Before
L - Leaving
E - Earth

 

[kentzlip21]

https://youtube/vzah9UgHGQU sound life check...!

 

[Kaplok Kaplok]

generally speaking in general lang any religion Christianity at iba pa or ancient religions, animism, shamanism, spirits

YES tool of control sya why kung hindi sya tool of control wala ng civilization ngayon hindi yan mag-prosper ang civilization ng tao kase gagawin ng tao gusto nyang gawin papatay yan, mang-aagaw ng asawa, magiging psychopath dahil wala syang kinakatakutan na eternal damnation or karma or nirvana to control ya primal instinct natin

sa current time may control pa ba obvious naman na nabawasan na yun control you can be what you want to be feeling mo ibon ka or aso ka pwede ngayon

LGBT pwedeng pwede sa christianity at sa japan

iba transable gusto nilang maging disable kahit healthy sila

gusto mong maging atheist or theist libre ngayon walang nagbabawal at wala ng excommunication or inquisition ngayon

pero syempre may mga LAWS pa din tayo not to harm other people

Ayon sa explanation mo, hindi nmn tool for control ang religion.

Naging framework lang siya. I understand na it seems that way kasi sa language ng mga historians "sinakop ng christianity ang ibat-abang bansa" kaya nagkaroon ng mga civilizations.

If you look at it another way, ung adoption ng christianity, naging framework lng siya para bumuo ng civilization. Simply because yan din ang mas compatible sa commerce and trade.

If it was for control, bakit meron padin lgbt mula noon hanggang ngayon? Bakit meron pading psychopaths?

I mean, yes my mga time sa history na sinubukang gamitin ito for control like panahon ni Jesus, panahon ni Lapu-lapu, at ni Rizal. Pero yan din ang panahon ng pagbagsak sa status quo ng religion.

Diba may sense i-conclude na ang religion was not meant to be a tool for control, but only a framework? Kasi tulad ng sabi mo, "nawawalan na ng control" ang religion ngayon. Pero bakit tumatakbo padin ang civilization natin? Kasi ung framework na nailatag na ng christianity ay pasok na sa mga laws, principles at culture natin.

It does not matter anymore kung ano ang religious identification ng mga tao. At least for the meantime.

 

[plhbg1]

Kasi tulad ng sabi mo, "nawawalan na ng control" ang religion ngayon. Pero bakit tumatakbo padin ang civilization natin?

it is because you stick to the idea that it is religion that made people civilized gaya nung pinag talunan natin, di lahat ng tao sumasamba sa ganyang idea e, meron namang tulad ko na religion is just one of the things introduced together with civilization by method of conquest, in this idea walang kinalaman ang religion sa civilization but they are both introduced during conquest most especially if the conqueror is a religious colonial force

 

[Kaplok Kaplok]

it is because you stick to the idea that it is religion that made people civilized gaya nung pinag talunan natin, di lahat ng tao sumasamba sa ganyang idea e, meron namang tulad ko na religion is just one of the things introduced together with civilization by method of conquest, in this idea walang kinalaman ang religion sa civilization but they are both introduced during conquest most especially if the conqueror is a religious colonial force

Whatever tickle your pickle dude. Puro feelings lng nmn pinaiiral mo. Wala kang objectivity.

 

[plhbg1]

Whatever tickle your pickle dude. Puro feelings lng nmn pinaiiral mo. Wala kang objectivity.

ows? if religion brings civilization then let's talk about Malaysia kasi unsuccessful ang christianization doon, ngayon sabihin mo sa akin sino ang mas civilized between Malaysia and Philippines, hindi na-christianize si Malaysia so base on your idea that religion is the civilization bringer magiging uncivilized si Malaysia

dagdag ko pa ang paganism which is also a religion, base on your idea paganism will also bring civilization

 

[Kaplok Kaplok]

ows? if religion brings civilization then let's talk about Malaysia kasi unsuccessful ang christianization doon, ngayon sabihin mo sa akin sino ang mas civilized between Malaysia and Philippines, hindi na-christianize si Malaysia so base on your idea that religion is the civilization bringer magiging uncivilized si Malaysia

dagdag ko pa ang paganism which is also a religion, base on your idea paganism will also bring civilization

Sinabi ko ba na hindi gumagana ang islam? Saka religion din yan.
Ang sabi ko it is a framework. Nakakain k nnmn yata ng panis noh?

 

[plhbg1]

Sinabi ko ba na hindi gumagana ang islam? Saka religion din yan.
Ang sabi ko it is a framework. Nakakain k nnmn yata ng panis noh?

ahaha that would mean as people continues to tick "no religion" they are getting uncivilized as well hehe

 

[Kaplok Kaplok]

ahaha that would mean as people continues to tick "no religion" they are getting uncivilized as well hehe

No. It will simply vanish.

No. It will simply vanish.

Either you get conquered by another religion/belief system, or maubos ang population.

 

[plhbg1]

No. It will simply vanish.

vanished civilization will result to uncivilization

Either you get conquered by another religion/belief system, or maubos ang population.

so that would mean that "no religion" groups cannot expand since they get replaced by another religion

 

[Kaplok Kaplok]

vanity of civilization will result to uncivilization

Call it whatever you want. Pero tingnan mo nlng ang history kung nasaan na ang mga dating civilizations.
Masyado kang kampante sa laya at security na ntatamasa mo dahil sa religion. But everything is subject to erosion and enthropy.

Bigay ka ng example ng isang bansa or group of people na walang religion, or hindi tinatag ng sa religious principles.

 

[plhbg1]

Call it whatever you want. Pero tingnan mo nlng ang history kung nasaan na ang mga dating civilizations.
Masyado kang kampante sa laya at security na ntatamasa mo dahil sa religion. But everything is subject to erosion and enthropy.

Bigay ka ng example ng isang bansa or group of people na walang religion, or hindi tinatag ng sa religious principles.

that would mean that man cannot be in a "no religion" for life, kasi no religion means no civilization

 

[Kaplok Kaplok]

that would mean that man cannot be in a "no religion" for life, kasi no religion means no civilization

Saan mo nakuha yan conclusion na yan?

 

[plhbg1]

Saan mo nakuha yan conclusion na yan?

based iyan sa idea mo na no religion means no civilization, mas naging importante pa pala ang religion kaysa education in getting people civilized hehe

 

[Kaplok Kaplok]

based iyan sa idea mo na no religion means no civilization, mas naging importante pa pala ang religion kaysa education in getting people civilized hehe

Nag imbento nnmn ng conclusion mula sa maling pag intindi. Wala kang alam sa history.

 

[plhbg1]

Nag imbento nnmn ng conclusion mula sa maling pag intindi. Wala kang alam sa history.

ahaha so di nga totoo na no religion means no civilization haha sabi ko sa iyo hindi religion ang nagpapa civilized ng tao