BIBLE, A TOOL TO CONTROL?

[thy-wilt]

 

[Cerebellum]

2 Tim. 3:16, 17

All Scripture is inspired of God and beneficial for teaching, for reproving, for setting things straight, for disciplining in righteousness, so that the man of God may be fully competent, completely equipped for every good work.

—

How can the Bible help us to enjoy our daily life?​

The Bible gives us good advice. For example, it teaches families how to be truly happy. It offers advice on how to deal with stress and how to enjoy our work.

 

[plhbg1]

haha 100% true for a tool to control in the past but goes weaker as days go by and as literacy is improved

 

[Cerebellum]

haha 100% true for a tool to control in the past but goes weaker as days go by and as literacy is imporved

does the Bible can be considered as a literature or not?

 

[plhbg1]

does the Bible can be considered as a literature or not?

it has all the attributes of literature that it cannot go out of being a literature

 

[Cerebellum]

it has all the attributes of literature that it can go out of being a literature

so, for you paps, literature ba ang Bibliya o hindi?

 

[plhbg1]

so, for you paps, literature ba ang Bibliya o hindi?

nauna explanation e hehe siyempre of course it is

 

[Cerebellum]

nauna explanation e hehe siyempre of course it is

okay ..

ang mga literature ba na babasahin ay puwedeng unawain ng literal lang or puwede rin simbolikal?

 

[plhbg1]

okay ..

ang mga literature ba na babasahin ay puwedeng unawain ng literal lang or puwede rin simbolikal?

depends on the reader iyan, i can interpret all what i read (literature only) as symbolical if gustohin ko

 

[Cerebellum]

depends on the reader iyan, i can interpret all what i read (literature only) as symbolical if gustohin ko

so when you read the Bible pala, nakadepende din pala sayo kung literal or simbolikal yung pagkakaunawa mo?

 

[MrBeats]

basta for me, i believe in Bible

 

[plhbg1]

so when you read the Bible pala, nakadepende din pala sayo kung literal or simbolikal yung pagkakaunawa mo?

yup just like the works of rizal i can give both literal and symbolical meanings to them hehe it's all at the readers discretion

 

[Cerebellum]

yup just like the works of rizal i can give both literal and symbolical meanings to them hehe it's all at the readers discretion

So bakit noon paps, tinatanong mo kami kung bakit hindi na lang ginawa ng Diyos na 'literal' na lang na bigyang kahulugan ang salita niya, bakit pa kailangan may iba pang pakahulugan, kung alam mo naman palang puwedeng unawain ng literal o simbolikal ang mababasa sa Bible? sumang-ayon ka ngang literature yung Bible eh, dba?

 

[plhbg1]

So bakit noon paps, tinatanong mo kami kung bakit hindi na lang ginawa ng Diyos na 'literal' na lang na bigyang kahulugan ang salita niya, bakit pa kailangan may iba pang pakahulugan, kung alam mo naman palang puwedeng unawain ng literal o simbolikal ang mababasa sa Bible? sumang-ayon ka ngang literature yung Bible eh, dba?

of course because that is granting the bible is true, yun ang context doon, dito is granting the bible is literature kaya nga if we grant it as literature we can now state the fact that the meaning is at the reader's discretion

 

[Cerebellum]

of course because that is granting the bible is true, yun ang context doon, dito is granting the bible is literature kaya nga if we grant it as literature we can now state the fact that the meaning is at the reader's discretion

so walang problema sa'yo if some verses sa Bible are literal or symbolical?

 

[plhbg1]

so walang problema sa'yo if some verses sa Bible are literal or symbolical?

la talaga problema dun just like rizals work, if wala naman ako exam sa noli at fili then i can give my own meaning, ganoon lang iyon we are not required to follow what is conventional

 

[JokeUnavailbe]

Dependi sa inyo kung paano nyo babasahin ang bibliya, kung bumabasa kayo na literal na topa kayong nag babasa syempre ma cocontrol talaga kayo, tulad nalang ng totoonv topa, pero pag babasahin nyo with critical thinking mula umpisa sabayan pa ng real history, kayo na humusga kung dapat ka ba magpa control.

 

[Kaplok Kaplok]

depends on the reader iyan, i can interpret all what i read (literature only) as symbolical if gustohin ko

So kung para sayo tool for control ang bible, dahil ikaw as a reader ang may gusto mabasa ito sa ganitong praan?
Marahil ay nakakulong ka sa mga pag iisip ng isang tyrant, or subject ng isang tyrant kung ganito LANG ang pananaw mo dito.

 

[plhbg1]

So kung para sayo tool for control ang bible, dahil ikaw as a reader ang may gusto mabasa ito sa ganitong praan?
Marahil ay nakakulong ka sa mga pag iisip ng isang tyrant, or subject ng isang tyrant kung ganito LANG ang pananaw mo dito.

toink kaya nga tool lang siya it means meron gagamit sa kanya to serve its mind controlling purpose, kaya nga diba sinasabi palagi ng religion na wag aralin on your own kasi the reader might not get controlled without someone who knows how to use the tool and this is due to the readers freedom to give any meaning to it

 

[Cerebellum]

to serve its mind controlling purpose

pano sya paps naging mind controlling tools?