Attachments
-
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
does the Bible can be considered as a literature or not?haha 100% true for a tool to control in the past but goes weaker as days go by and as literacy is imporved
it has all the attributes of literature that it cannot go out of being a literaturedoes the Bible can be considered as a literature or not?
so, for you paps, literature ba ang Bibliya o hindi?it has all the attributes of literature that it can go out of being a literature
nauna explanation e hehe siyempre of course it isso, for you paps, literature ba ang Bibliya o hindi?
okay ..nauna explanation e hehe siyempre of course it is
depends on the reader iyan, i can interpret all what i read (literature only) as symbolical if gustohin kookay ..
ang mga literature ba na babasahin ay puwedeng unawain ng literal lang or puwede rin simbolikal?
so when you read the Bible pala, nakadepende din pala sayo kung literal or simbolikal yung pagkakaunawa mo?depends on the reader iyan, i can interpret all what i read (literature only) as symbolical if gustohin ko
yup just like the works of rizal i can give both literal and symbolical meanings to them hehe it's all at the readers discretionso when you read the Bible pala, nakadepende din pala sayo kung literal or simbolikal yung pagkakaunawa mo?
So bakit noon paps, tinatanong mo kami kung bakit hindi na lang ginawa ng Diyos na 'literal' na lang na bigyang kahulugan ang salita niya, bakit pa kailangan may iba pang pakahulugan, kung alam mo naman palang puwedeng unawain ng literal o simbolikal ang mababasa sa Bible? sumang-ayon ka ngang literature yung Bible eh, dba?yup just like the works of rizal i can give both literal and symbolical meanings to them hehe it's all at the readers discretion
of course because that is granting the bible is true, yun ang context doon, dito is granting the bible is literature kaya nga if we grant it as literature we can now state the fact that the meaning is at the reader's discretionSo bakit noon paps, tinatanong mo kami kung bakit hindi na lang ginawa ng Diyos na 'literal' na lang na bigyang kahulugan ang salita niya, bakit pa kailangan may iba pang pakahulugan, kung alam mo naman palang puwedeng unawain ng literal o simbolikal ang mababasa sa Bible? sumang-ayon ka ngang literature yung Bible eh, dba?
so walang problema sa'yo if some verses sa Bible are literal or symbolical?of course because that is granting the bible is true, yun ang context doon, dito is granting the bible is literature kaya nga if we grant it as literature we can now state the fact that the meaning is at the reader's discretion
la talaga problema dun just like rizals work, if wala naman ako exam sa noli at fili then i can give my own meaning, ganoon lang iyon we are not required to follow what is conventionalso walang problema sa'yo if some verses sa Bible are literal or symbolical?
So kung para sayo tool for control ang bible, dahil ikaw as a reader ang may gusto mabasa ito sa ganitong praan?depends on the reader iyan, i can interpret all what i read (literature only) as symbolical if gustohin ko
toink kaya nga tool lang siya it means meron gagamit sa kanya to serve its mind controlling purpose, kaya nga diba sinasabi palagi ng religion na wag aralin on your own kasi the reader might not get controlled without someone who knows how to use the tool and this is due to the readers freedom to give any meaning to itSo kung para sayo tool for control ang bible, dahil ikaw as a reader ang may gusto mabasa ito sa ganitong praan?
Marahil ay nakakulong ka sa mga pag iisip ng isang tyrant, or subject ng isang tyrant kung ganito LANG ang pananaw mo dito.
pano sya paps naging mind controlling tools?to serve its mind controlling purpose